A real-company case study for Unit 1, Task 4 of AP Business with Personal Finance, written in the same format as the course's business cases. Read the case, answer each question on your own, then open the sample answers to check your thinking. Facts are current as of October 2026, and every source is listed at the bottom.
The Case
- Business: Patagonia — outdoor apparel and gear
- Industry: Outdoor apparel
- Founded: 1973, by Yvon Chouinard
- Headquarters: Ventura, California
- Key people: Yvon Chouinard (founder); Ryan Gellert (CEO); Claire Chouinard (board chair)
- Ownership/Status: Private, for-profit company; certified B Corp and California benefit corporation; owned since 2022 by the Patagonia Purpose Trust (voting stock) and the Holdfast Collective (nonvoting stock)
A Climber’s Company
Before Patagonia, Yvon Chouinard was a craftsman who made climbing gear for himself and his friends. In 1973 he founded Patagonia, an outdoor apparel company based in Ventura, California. Since 1985, Patagonia has given money to grassroots environmental groups, and it now pledges 1% of its sales every year to preserving and restoring the natural environment. In 2002, Chouinard and Craig Mathews, the owner of Blue Ribbon Flies, created 1% for the Planet, a nonprofit that encourages other businesses to make the same pledge. Patagonia says it has contributed more than $240 million to environmental organizations.
From Mission Statement to Purpose
In the years before 2018, the last line of Patagonia’s mission statement promised to “use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis.” In 2018, the company changed its stated purpose to a much shorter sentence: “We’re in business to save our home planet.” Patagonia’s recent progress report says this purpose is now written into the company’s legal charter.
The company also spells out core values. In 2022, it updated them to describe the kind of company it wants to be over its next 50 years:
- Quality: make the best products, provide the best service, and keep improving everything.
- Integrity: look at its own practices openly and honestly, learn from mistakes, and keep its commitments.
- Environmentalism: protect the home planet.
- Justice: be just, equitable, and antiracist, both inside the company and in its community.
- Not bound by convention: find its own way of doing things.
Those values show up in what Patagonia sells and how it reports. The company backs its products with what it calls its Ironclad Guarantee, sells used clothing through its Worn Wear program, and runs repair programs. In fiscal 2025, it repaired 174,799 products around the world. Its progress report also lists its shortcomings: the company was responsible for 182,646 metric tons of greenhouse-gas emissions in fiscal 2025, and it says about 85% of its products still have no end-of-life solution.
Choosing a Legal Form
Patagonia has also made deliberate choices about its legal form. In January 2012, it became one of the first companies in California to register as a benefit corporation, and it is a certified B Corporation. Later, the company created Patagonia Works, a holding company for Patagonia’s apparel business and related ventures in food and media, with each company organized as a benefit corporation.
A New Kind of Ownership
By 2022, the Chouinard family faced a big question: who should own Patagonia in the future? In a letter dated September 14, 2022, Yvon Chouinard explained the answer. Selling the company was risky, he wrote, because a new owner might not keep its values. He also ruled out going public, arguing that the stock market pushes even well-meaning companies to focus on quick profits instead of the long term. Instead, the family gave the company away.
The new structure has two owners (Exhibit 1). The Patagonia Purpose Trust holds all of the voting stock, which is 2% of the company. It must approve key decisions, such as who serves on the board and changes to the company’s charter, and the Chouinard family guides it. The Holdfast Collective, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit, holds all of the nonvoting stock, which is 98% of the company. Each year, profits that are not reinvested in the business are paid to Holdfast as a dividend. Holdfast can use that money for grants and investments, and it can also advocate for causes and political candidates. Chouinard described the result by saying that Earth was now the company’s only shareholder. Patagonia remains a for-profit business, a certified B Corp, and a California benefit corporation. Its pledge to give 1% of sales each year now cannot be changed without the trust’s approval.
Where Things Stand
Ryan Gellert, who previously spent six years as general manager for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, serves as CEO, and the Chouinard family remains involved. In March 2026, Patagonia announced that Yvon Chouinard’s daughter, Claire Chouinard, was taking over as board chair, succeeding Charles Conn, who had held the role since 2019. Giving continues through several channels. In fiscal 2025, Patagonia gave $14.7 million in grants and in-kind support to 824 nonprofits through its 1% for the Planet commitment. Holdfast, for its part, spent $2 million to protect Georgia wetlands from mining; in June 2025 it helped a conservation group buy and protect about 8,000 acres near the Okefenokee Swamp. In April 2026, Holdfast renewed a $1.55 million, three-year grant to the Rodale Institute’s Regenerate Ventura project, which aims to shift farming in Ventura County toward organic and regenerative methods.
Patagonia also takes public stands. In September 2026, it sued the Trump administration over a presidential proclamation that shrank Bears Ears National Monument, arguing that the reduction was illegal. The company had also sued in 2017, when the monument was reduced during Trump’s first term. Patagonia says it plans to keep operating for the next 50 years and beyond — as a business whose profits, after reinvestment, go to protecting the planet.
| Owner | Type of organization | Share of company | What it holds and does |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patagonia Purpose Trust | Trust guided by the Chouinard family | 2% | Holds all voting stock; approves key decisions such as board membership and changes to the company’s charter |
| Holdfast Collective | 501(c)(4) nonprofit | 98% | Holds all nonvoting stock; receives each year’s profits not reinvested in the business as a dividend; makes grants and investments and can advocate for causes and political candidates |
Source: Patagonia, “Earth Is Now Our Only Shareholder” (Yvon Chouinard’s letter of September 14, 2022, and FAQ).
Reading Questions
These are the same for every case. They check that you caught the basics before you analyze.
1. Which business does this case feature, and what product or service does it provide?
2. Who are the key people named in the case, and what roles do they play? Which other stakeholders — individuals or groups — have an interest in the business?
3. Identify an opportunity and/or a challenge the business faces in this case.
Practice Questions
These apply the Unit 1 concepts from Task 4 to the case, in the style of AP free-response prompts.
1. Evaluate Patagonia’s 2018 statement, “We’re in business to save our home planet.” Explain whether it works better as a mission statement or a vision statement, using evidence from the case.Topic 1.5 · LO 1.5.B
2. Explain how one of Patagonia’s core values and one of its core competencies shaped a specific business decision described in the case.Topic 1.5 · LO 1.5.A
3. Describe the goals of Patagonia and of the Holdfast Collective. Explain why Patagonia can be classified as a social enterprise rather than a traditional for-profit business or a nonprofit.Topic 1.5 · LO 1.5.C
Discussion Questions
Talk these through with a partner or your class. There's more than one good answer, so back yours up with evidence from the case.
- Compare Patagonia’s older mission statement with its 2018 statement. Which one would better help an employee decide between a cheaper material and a more environmentally friendly one? Why?
- Yvon Chouinard rejected both selling Patagonia and taking it public. What risks might come with the structure he chose instead?
- Patagonia’s progress report openly lists its emissions and admits that most of its products lack an end-of-life solution. Does publishing its shortcomings build or weaken trust? Which core value does it reflect?
- Which do you think best protects Patagonia’s mission over the long run: (a) its mission statement, (b) its core values, (c) its benefit-corporation and B Corp status, or (d) its 2022 ownership structure? Defend your choice with evidence.
- When a company’s mission leads it into legal or political fights, such as Patagonia’s lawsuits over Bears Ears National Monument, what are the possible benefits and risks for its customers, employees, and reputation?
Application Activity
Key Takeaways
- A mission statement explains why a business exists. Patagonia’s 2018 shift to a short purpose — “We’re in business to save our home planet” — gave leaders a clear test for big decisions, such as the 2022 ownership change.
- Core values and core competencies drive daily choices. Values such as Quality, Integrity, and Environmentalism, combined with Patagonia’s skill at making durable, repairable products, show up in its Ironclad Guarantee, its Worn Wear program, and its public progress reports.
- Patagonia is a for-profit company with a social mission — an example of a social enterprise — now owned by a trust and a nonprofit. Comparing Patagonia with the Holdfast Collective shows how the goals of a business, a social enterprise, and a nonprofit differ, and why a social enterprise must earn profits to fund its mission.
Use it in your Business Canvas Project
Your Canvas Organization component asks for a vision statement and a mission statement. Test yours the way Patagonia uses its purpose: could an employee use it to choose between two real options? If not, make it more specific.
For Teachers
Tip: “Print case” prints the case and all questions with the sample answers hidden, so it works as a student handout.
Sources
- Earth Is Now Our Only Shareholder (Yvon Chouinard’s letter and FAQ), Patagonia, 2022-09-14
- Our Core Values, Patagonia, 2026-10-16
- 1% for the Planet, Patagonia, 2026-10-16
- Holdfast collective renews $1.55M commitment to Rodale Institute Regenerate Ventura, Patagonia Works (press release), 2026-04-08
- Work in Progress Report (2025 Impact Report, fiscal 2025), Patagonia, 2026-10-16
- Business Unusual, Patagonia, 2026-10-16
- Introducing Patagonia Works, a new kind of holding company (letter from Yvon Chouinard), Patagonia Works, 2013-05-06
- FAQ, Patagonia Works, 2026-10-16
- Patagonia announces new board chair, members, Patagonia Works (press release), 2026-03
- Patagonia sues Trump administration again to defend Bears Ears, Patagonia Works (press release), 2026-09-02
This case was written for educational use from the public sources listed above. Patagonia did not review it and is not affiliated with this site; company names are trademarks of their owners. This resource is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by College Board.