AP Business Case Study · Unit 3, Task 5

Chobani: Funding a Yogurt Giant With Loans, Bonds, and Shares

🛠️ Skill Builder
Unit 3 · Financial Capital

A real-company case study for Unit 3, Task 5 of AP Business with Personal Finance, written in the same format as the course's business cases. Read the case, answer each question on your own, then open the sample answers to check your thinking. Facts are current as of October 2026, and every source is listed at the bottom.

The Case

Unit & taskUnit 3, Task 5: Financial Capital
Topic3.5
Key peopleHamdi Ulukaya (Founder and majority owner; CEO and chairperson (per Chobani’s 2021 SEC filing)); TPG Capital (Private equity firm that provided a $750 million loan with warrants in 2014)
Case years2005–2026 · Evaluation case
Key questionHow did Hamdi Ulukaya use different sources of financial capital — loans, bonds, and equity — to pay for Chobani’s growth while keeping control of the company?
Business Canvas componentsFinance, Operations
Snapshot
  • Business: Chobani — Greek yogurt and other foods and drinks, including La Colombe coffee
  • Industry: Food and beverage manufacturing (dairy)
  • Founded: 2005, in New Berlin, New York (first yogurt produced in 2007)
  • Key people: Hamdi Ulukaya, founder; CEO and chairperson as of Chobani’s 2021 IPO filing
  • Ownership/Status: Privately held (Forbes, October 2025); Forbes estimated Ulukaya owned about 68%

A Factory Found in the Mail

Hamdi Ulukaya moved from Turkey to the United States in 1994. He was running Euphrates, a small feta cheese company in Johnstown, New York, when an advertisement arrived in the mail in 2005: Kraft Foods was selling an old yogurt plant in New Berlin, a small town in upstate New York. Ulukaya toured the plant and decided the next day to buy it, more than two years before any Chobani yogurt would reach a store. The plant cost less than $1 million, and he paid for it with a loan backed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). The purchase closed in August 2005.

The building was run-down and its yogurt-making equipment was aging. Ulukaya hired back five of Kraft’s former workers, and it was 2007 before the plant made its first cup of Chobani Greek yogurt, a thick yogurt with double the protein of the regular kind. That October, the first shipment went to a single grocery store on Long Island.

Growing Faster Than the Cash

Rather than limiting itself to specialty food shops, Chobani pitched its yogurt to mainstream grocery chains, hoping to win over even shoppers who had never liked yogurt. Demand took off. Less than four years after launch, the New York plant was running three shifts a day and producing 1.2 million cases of yogurt a week, and its workforce had grown from fewer than 50 people to 670. Greek yogurt went from less than 1% of the yogurt market when Ulukaya started to more than half of it by 2014, and Chobani’s yearly sales passed $1 billion by 2013.

Growth like that is expensive. Chobani spent about $250 million upgrading its New York plant and at least $450 million building a new factory in Twin Falls, Idaho. Big competitors noticed, too: Dannon and Yoplait (then owned by General Mills) launched their own Greek-style yogurts. Then, in the fall of 2013, Chobani had to recall yogurt that had grown mold.

2014: A $750 Million Loan With a Twist

In April 2014, Chobani announced a $750 million deal with TPG Capital, a large private equity firm. The deal was structured like a loan, so Chobani would have to pay the money back. But TPG also received warrants, which it could later turn into an ownership stake in Chobani. The full terms were not made public. The New York Times reported that the warrants could give TPG up to 35% of the company, and Fortune reported, citing a person close to the deal, that the size of the stake depended on whether Chobani met certain performance goals. TPG also got two seats on Chobani’s board of directors. The money was meant to pay for new products and expansion into markets in Asia and South America. At the time, Ulukaya told Fortune that an initial public offering (IPO) was probably Chobani’s next big step, though not within the next year.

New Partners and a Shelved IPO

In April 2016, Ulukaya announced that Chobani’s roughly 2,000 employees would receive shares that could eventually add up to about 10% of the company, with the longest-serving workers getting the largest shares. Those shares would become valuable if Chobani were sold or went public. In mid-2018, TPG exited its investment, and the Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP), a Canadian pension fund, bought a minority stake that came with one board seat.

In November 2021, Chobani filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to sell shares to the public. The filing showed that Chobani had about $1.4 billion in net sales in 2020 and a net loss of $58.7 million. As of September 2021, it owed about $1.4 billion, including a term loan, bonds with interest rates of 7.50% and 4.625%, and equipment financing. Chobani was owned by Ulukaya, its employees, and HOOPP: Ulukaya beneficially owned 80% of the holding company that held Chobani’s main class of ownership units, and HOOPP owned the other 20%. Chobani planned to use part of the IPO money to pay down debt. But in September 2022, as the market for new stock offerings slumped, Chobani withdrew its IPO plans, citing market conditions.

New Money for New Plants

Chobani kept growing as a private company. It bought coffee maker La Colombe for $900 million in 2023, and in 2024 it was the top-selling yogurt brand in the United States. In October 2025, it raised $650 million in equity capital, meaning it sold ownership stakes to investors (Forbes did not name them). Forbes reported that the deal valued Chobani at about $20 billion and estimated that Ulukaya still owned about 68% of the company. Chobani expected about $3.8 billion in sales for 2025, up 28% from 2024. The new money was meant for growing production in Idaho and New York, including a $1.2 billion plant in Rome, New York.

Chobani also kept borrowing. In April 2026, it sold $800 million of new bonds that pay 6.375% interest a year and are due in 2034, in order to pay off older notes, due in 2029, that carried interest rates of 8.75% to 9.5%. Meanwhile, the Rome plant fell behind schedule. In August 2026, Chief Impact Officer Nishant Roy said Chobani had shifted its priorities to its existing plants to get products to market faster and meet growing demand, and the first phase of construction in Rome was expected to start between spring 2027 and summer 2028. More than 20 years after buying a run-down factory with a small-business loan, Chobani was still weighing, project by project, when to borrow money and when to share ownership.

Exhibit 1: How Chobani has raised financial capital
WhenSource of capitalDebt or equity?AmountMain use
2005Loan backed by the U.S. Small Business AdministrationDebtPlant cost less than $1 millionBuy a closed Kraft yogurt plant in New Berlin, N.Y.
2014TPG Capital (private equity firm)Debt, plus warrants that could become equity$750 millionNew products; expansion into Asia and South America
2018Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP)Equity (minority stake)Not disclosedReplaced TPG, which exited its investment
Owed as of Sept. 2021Term loan, bonds (notes), and equipment financingDebt (total owed)About $1.4 billionEarlier borrowing; IPO plan called for repaying part of it
2021–2022Planned IPO (selling shares to the public)EquityNone — withdrawn in Sept. 2022Would have helped pay down debt
Oct. 2025Equity investors (not named by Forbes)Equity$650 millionGrow production in Idaho and New York
April 2026Bond investors (senior notes due 2034)Debt$800 million at 6.375% interest a yearPay off older notes with 8.75%–9.5% interest rates

Sources: Hoard’s Dairyman (2012); Fortune (2014); Food Processing (2014, 2018); Chobani Form S-1 filed with the SEC (2021); CNBC (2022); Forbes (2025); Gibson Dunn (2026). TPG’s full terms were never made public.

Reading Questions

These are the same for every case. They check that you caught the basics before you analyze.

1. Which business does this case feature, and what product or service does it provide?
The case features Chobani, a food company Hamdi Ulukaya founded in 2005 in New Berlin, New York. It makes Greek yogurt, which is thicker than regular yogurt and has twice the protein, and it has expanded into other foods and drinks, including La Colombe coffee, which it bought for $900 million in 2023. By 2024, Chobani was the top-selling yogurt brand in the United States.
2. Who are the key people named in the case, and what roles do they play? Which other stakeholders — individuals or groups — have an interest in the business?
Hamdi Ulukaya is the founder and majority owner who bought the plant with an SBA-backed loan and made the major funding decisions (Forbes estimated he owned about 68% in 2025). Nishant Roy, Chobani’s chief impact officer, explained in 2026 why the Rome plant was delayed. TPG Capital was a lender (with warrants and two board seats) from 2014 until it exited in 2018, and HOOPP, a Canadian pension fund, became a minority owner with one board seat. Other stakeholders include employees (about 2,000 received shares in 2016), the five former Kraft workers Ulukaya hired back, the SBA, which backed the original loan, bondholders who bought Chobani’s notes, the investors who put in $650 million in 2025, competitors such as Dannon and Yoplait, grocery stores and customers, and the communities in Idaho and New York where Chobani builds plants.
3. Identify an opportunity and/or a challenge the business faces in this case.
Opportunity: Greek yogurt grew from less than 1% of the yogurt market to more than half by 2014, and Chobani’s sales passed $1 billion by 2013, so there was huge demand to serve. Challenge: meeting that demand required very expensive fixed assets — about $250 million to upgrade the New York plant and at least $450 million for the Twin Falls factory — far more than the business could pay for from its own cash, so Chobani had to keep raising outside capital. It also faced new competition from Dannon and Yoplait, a 2013 mold recall, and, in 2026, a delay in building its $1.2 billion Rome plant.

Practice Questions

These apply the Unit 3 concepts from Task 5 to the case, in the style of AP free-response prompts.

1. Explain why Chobani sought external financial capital in 2014 instead of relying only on its own profits. Use evidence from the case.Topic 3.5 · LO 3.5.A
Chobani’s sales grew very quickly — the New York plant was producing 1.2 million cases a week less than four years after launch, and yearly sales passed $1 billion by 2013. To keep up with that demand, Chobani had already bought expensive fixed assets: it spent about $250 million upgrading its New York plant and at least $450 million on a new factory in Twin Falls, Idaho. Next, it wanted to launch new products and expand into Asia and South America, the stated uses of TPG’s money. Spending on that scale has to happen before the new sales it creates come in, and it was far larger than the original small-business loan, so the company sought $750 million in external capital from TPG. Waiting to fund growth slowly from profits was also risky because large competitors like Dannon and Yoplait were launching Greek yogurts of their own.
2. In 2014, TPG provided Chobani with a $750 million loan that also came with warrants. Describe one potential benefit and one potential risk to TPG of this deal.Topic 3.5 · LO 3.5.C
Benefit: As a lender, TPG would earn interest on the $750 million, and the warrants gave it the chance to become a part owner later. If Chobani’s value rose — for example, through an IPO — TPG could share in that capital gain, a higher potential return than interest alone; its two board seats also gave it a voice in protecting its investment. Risk: The main risk to any lender is default. Chobani had just had a mold recall in the fall of 2013, faced new competition from Dannon and Yoplait, and was spending hundreds of millions of dollars on plants, so if sales had slowed, it might have struggled to repay, and the warrants could have ended up worth little.
3. In April 2026, Chobani sold $800 million of bonds that pay 6.375% interest a year. (a) Calculate the yearly interest Chobani owes on these bonds. (b) Explain one advantage and one disadvantage, for Chobani’s owners, of raising money with debt like these bonds instead of selling more shares (equity), as Chobani did in 2025.Topic 3.5 · LO 3.5.B
(a) $800,000,000 × 0.06375 = $51,000,000 in interest per year (about $51 million). (b) Advantage: Bondholders are lenders, not owners, so borrowing does not reduce Ulukaya’s ownership (an estimated 68% in 2025); the bondholders get interest but no share of future profits and no votes, so the owners keep all the upside if Chobani keeps growing. Disadvantage: Debt creates required payments. Chobani must pay about $51 million in interest every year whether sales are strong or weak, and it must repay the $800 million principal when the bonds come due in 2034; missing payments would be a default. The $650 million of equity raised in 2025 did not have to be repaid and carries no interest, but it gave new investors a share of ownership and future profits.

Discussion Questions

Talk these through with a partner or your class. There's more than one good answer, so back yours up with evidence from the case.

  1. Ulukaya bought a factory before he had a yogurt brand or customers. What made this risky for him and for the lender? What might have reduced the lender’s risk?
  2. TPG’s 2014 deal was a loan with warrants instead of a straight purchase of shares. Why might a founder prefer that structure? What did Ulukaya give up anyway?
  3. Chobani’s 2026 bonds pay 6.375% interest, while the older notes they replaced paid 8.75% to 9.5%. What might have changed about Chobani, or about how lenders viewed its risk, to make the lower rate possible?
  4. Which factor do you think most made investors willing to put $650 million into Chobani in 2025? (a) Its sales growth, (b) the founder’s track record, (c) its plans for new plants, or (d) its position as the top-selling U.S. yogurt brand. Defend your choice with evidence from the case.
  5. Chobani withdrew its IPO in 2022 and later raised equity privately. What are the tradeoffs for a company and its founder between selling shares to the public and staying private?

Application Activity

Pick a local business that might want to open a second location, or your own Business Canvas Project business. Write a short pitch (about 150 words) to a prospective lender or investor. Include how much money you need and what it will be used for, whether you are asking for a loan (with a repayment plan) or equity (with the percentage of ownership offered), evidence that customers want the product, and at least one way you will reduce the funder’s risk. Then explain in two sentences why you chose debt or equity.

Key Takeaways

  • Businesses seek external financial capital when growth outruns what owners and profits can pay for. Chobani needed an SBA-backed loan to buy its first plant and much larger amounts later to build plants and expand.
  • Debt and equity involve a tradeoff. Loans and bonds (the SBA loan, TPG’s loan, and the 2026 notes) let Ulukaya keep ownership but require interest and repayment; equity (HOOPP’s stake, which replaced TPG, and the 2025 raise) provides money that does not have to be repaid but shares ownership, future profits, and sometimes board seats. TPG’s warrants mixed the two.
  • Lenders and investors weigh risk against return. TPG earned interest with a chance at ownership gains, but it risked default; lower interest rates usually go to borrowers that lenders see as less risky.

Use it in your Business Canvas Project

List the startup costs your Canvas business must pay before it earns revenue and decide which you will cover with your own savings, a loan, or an equity investor. Like Ulukaya, explain what each choice costs you — interest and required payments for debt, or a share of ownership and control for equity.

For Teachers

Opening activity: Ask students: If you needed $2,000 to start a small business, would you rather borrow it from a relative and pay it back with interest, or let the relative own one-quarter of the business forever? Have students share their reasons, then explain that businesses face the same choice between debt (borrowing) and equity (selling ownership).

Tip: “Print case” prints the case and all questions with the sample answers hidden, so it works as a student handout.

Sources

  1. Chobani Inc. Form S-1 Registration Statement, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR), 2021-11-17
  2. U.S. Small Business Administration: Agro Farma (Chobani), Hoard’s Dairyman, 2012-05-04
  3. Exclusive: Chobani CEO on TPG’s mega investment, Fortune, 2014-04-25
  4. Chobani Raises $750 Million in Debt From TPG Capital, Food Processing, 2014-04
  5. Why Chobani Gave Employees A Financial Stake In Company’s Future, NPR, 2016-04-28
  6. Chobani Transfers Equity to Canadian Pension Plan, Food Processing, 2018-07-26
  7. Chobani pulls plan for IPO, CNBC, 2022-09-02
  8. Chobani’s Founder Is $11 Billion Richer After Huge New Funding Round, Forbes, 2025-10-16
  9. Gibson Dunn Advised Chobani on Offering of $800 Million of Senior Notes, Gibson Dunn, 2026-04-27
  10. Chobani Updates Construction Status on $1.2 Billion, Rome, New York, Facility, Food Processing, 2026-08-13

This case was written for educational use from the public sources listed above. Chobani did not review it and is not affiliated with this site; company names are trademarks of their owners. This resource is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by College Board.